Tag: Sony

  • Total Solar Eclipse in Texas

    Total Solar Eclipse in Texas

    For a brief moment, the sun, the moon, and I were in alignment. I was there, prepared, and these are my photos of the event. 

    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 2x Teleconverter | 800mm | ISO 100 | f/16 | 1/640 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 2x Teleconverter | 800mm | ISO 100 | f/16 | 1/640 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 2x Teleconverter | 800mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 1/640 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 2x Teleconverter | 800mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 1/25 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 2x Teleconverter | 800mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 1/100 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 2x Teleconverter | 800mm | ISO 2000 | f/11 | 1/25 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 2x Teleconverter | 800mm | ISO 1000 | f/11 | 1/640 sec

    Preparing for the Eclipse

    The First Attempt

    Preparing for this event started back in October of 2023. I was in Houston, and learned that an eclipse would be passing over south Texas in just a few day’s time. I was really kicking myself for not being prepared and being in the path. 

    I went to B&H to see what filters they had for eclipse photography, and I found a bunch of 16 stop neutral density filters that blocked ultraviolet and infrared radiation. I also learned that the PolarPro Summit filters that I use met these requirements. At the time, I had a 10 stop and a 6 stop filter, so I just planned on stacking them. 

    On the day of, I found a parking garage and setup my tripod. I enabled bracketing, manually focused, and started shooting. In Houston, we only saw about 85% coverage of the sun. I did not have eclipse glasses, and it was always too bright to look at. It does dim, but it’s a very gradual process. However, at peak coverage (for Houston) it was then obvious how much dimmer it was than normal. 

    This was good practice because the changing conditions did require changing the exposure. I really leaned on the histogram to gauge this, and it was reliable. Throughout the event, I did over and under expose just to see how those would turn out. Over exposed was terrible as the entire sun was clipping, but under exposed did appear to yield more detail. However, this was detail that was recoverable with some minor edits with the exposing to protect the highlights.

    Preparing for April 2024

    Fortunately, after the 2023 eclipse, I was pumped to learn of the total eclipse coming close by just 6 months away. I started looking into AirBNB’s in the area and quickly found that they were charging over $1000/night. I switched to hotels, and found one reasonably priced just east of Austin, so I booked it. It was nice to have that out of the way because a few weeks later a friend was doing the same search and found no results. 

    Next was gear. One effect I did have in my images from the first attempt was some ghosting. I did buy a 15 stop ND filter to eliminate that. I also purchased the 2x teleconverter. I know many believe teleconverters are bad because they degrade the image quality too much. I wanted to try it out, anyways. I took many test shots of many different subjects in different lighting conditions and pixel-peeped like there was no tomorrow. If I’m being honest, I don’t have the best trained eyes, and I don’t have experience with many other systems to compare against, but I was happy with the results. I found images to be sharp, and I liked the additional reach. The smaller apertures didn’t bother me, either. I do believe 800mm was a great focal length for shooting the eclipse. I also purchased some typical cardboard eclipse glasses. Coolness factor aside, being able to look up was useful.

    A few days before the eclipse, we did our grocery shopping so we could pack a cooler and be self sufficient on the day of. 

    The Eclipse

    The Weather

    As the calendar approached April, my attention turned to the weather. Many websites posted weather forecasts, but this wasn’t based on any real information. One thing I love about living in Houston, is having Space City Weather. That team does a fantastic job of interpreting the data and providing real information. They’re honest when confidence is low, and they also call out bogus predictions when the data isn’t there. 

    That rant about weather predictions was due to the fear and frustrations weeks prior to our trip. Fact is, the closer we got, the better the forecasts got, the worse the news got. Of learning of the grim forecast, I immediately became an armchair meteorologist. 

    The prospects weren’t good.

    Since I’m unable to affect the weather, I started searching and marking possible viewing locations like city and county parks. My goal was to have a plethora of options so on the day of, I could see where the best weather was and head to that general area.

    The Day Of

    Monday morning started at 5:00 AM. We had a 2 hour drive ahead of us, and we weren’t sure what kind of traffic we would encounter. We’d also be competing with typical Austin commuter traffic, too. My girlfriend was not appreciative of the early start.  

    Based on weather, it looks like we’d have a shot in Lampasas, which had a nice downtown park area, so that’s where we headed. 

    Traffic was thick, but not bad, and once we got to Austin and headed Northwest, things really cleared out. The more we drove, the light started to come out, we got further into Hill Country and it was a quite pleasant drive. 

    We made it to Lampasas with no drama. The park was quite empty, but people had been camping there overnight and we were far from the first on the scene. We were able to secure a picnic table and setup for a long day. I walked around the park. Here’s a shot of the creek and foot bridge.

    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 16-35mm GM II | 34mm | ISO 100 | f/5.6 | 1/25 sec

    Then it was just waiting for the eclipse, which was to start in early afternoon. As time got closer, I setup my equipment, did some test shots, confirmed focus and exposure. Then with about 10 minutes to go, it was all eyes on the sun. 

    By this time the park was packed. There was no more parking, and people were everywhere. We were situated next to a family from Alaska.

    It was an incredible day and a brilliant experience. I do recommend it if you’ve not had the chance before. Traffic was terrible on the way out, and we waited until the moon had passed completely by. Fortunately, I found back roads and wasn’t having to do deal with the stress of it all. 

    When we got back to the hotel, I did a quick first pass on my photos to share with friends and family. 

    Weeks later I finally got around to a more thorough culling process and creating my composite. 

  • My Lens Holy Trinity

    My Lens Holy Trinity

    I just completed my holy trinity today. I purchased the new Sony 16-35 G Master mark 2. This makes my holy trinity a 16-35, 24-70, and a 100-400. I had originally purchased a 70-200 (the G F4 model), but I constantly found myself wanting more reach, so I sold that and went with the 100-400. Even still I find myself wanting more reach, but for most opportunities, it is perfect.

    I’ve really struggled with my decision on wide angle options. I was waffling the 14mm G Master prime and the 16-35mm. The main two reasons I went 16-35 had to do with filters and flexibility.

    Most of my photography is landscapes and cityscapes. I’m often out in public or in the elements and frequently changing lenses is not always easy and rarely desirable. Although the 14mm with the aperture of 1.8 was very attractive, fact is, I’d throw it on to get a few shots, but then I’d want to switch back to my 24-70 for most shots. I do genuinely believe that given I’d have to change lenses frequently I’d likely no and miss opportunities. 16-35 gives me the wide view for vast landscapes or tight city views, but it also offers that 24-35 range so I can get some subject isolation when I want it. To me, this meant less lens changes and increased likelihood of actually using it.

    My camera does have an impressive dynamic range, but it isn’t unlimited, and thus I like gradient filters for sunrises/sunsets. I also like traditional ND filters for waterfalls or moving clouds/traffic to show that sense of movement. Even though the 14mm has a gel filter option, I already have filters. Filters I actually like. The 16-35 has a 82mm thread, which is the same as the 24-70, so I’m already set.

    My filters, PolarPro Summit, says they’re fully compatible to 17mm lenses, so I am interested in testing them out at 16 to see if it will work, or if I’ll have to do a minor zoom to make it work. I’ll be sure to update when I get a chance.

    These are the only three lenses I have at the moment. But since switching to Sony, I’ve had 11. I started off buying more affordable lenses, sensibly, but after encountering issues, I’ve been upgrading, but only now am I where I want to be.

    My first lens was the kit lens, 16-50 power zoom that shipped with the a6400. I remember taking some beautiful shots at sunrise in a marina, but it was so soft around the edges. Since that time I’ve gone from a 24 MP APS-C sensor to a 61 MP full frame. The need for better resolving lenses has increased, and although Sigma does a fantastic job for much less, I really appreciate Sony’s attention to size and weight.

  • Another Houston Weekend Morning

    Another Houston Weekend Morning

    I’ve been wanting to use the tele lens a little more lately. I really like my standard zoom for capturing the whole scene, but I need more practice on picking out the details that catch my eye.

    It was a cloudy morning, but the ceiling cleared the skyscrapers considerably. The City Hall building was lit in blue, and we could see the lights on the clouds above the city.

    After taking some shots of the city, I stopped by a transit station, and the bust station structure with the deep blue clouds caught my eye.

    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 158mm | ISO 100 | f/5 | 5.0 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 215mm | ISO 100 | f/5.6 | 5.0 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 400mm | ISO 100 | f/5.6 | 5.0 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 400mm | ISO 100 | f/5.6 | 5.0 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 100-400mm GM | 100mm | ISO 100 | f/4.5 | 2.0 sec
    Sony Alpha 7R IV | Sony 24-70mm GM II | 43mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 2.0 sec
  • Another rainy morning

    Another rainy morning

    I was woken on this morning by a thunderstorm, and thought, well I’m not going to get any pictures today. I pulled up the radar, and it was a smaller storm moving through pretty quickly. Then I thought, this might actually work out for me.

    In typical Houston fashion, I tried running to one of my favorite spots only to find the streets had been closed. What made that more excruciating was that on the way, I loved the view, but I lost another 10 minutes trying to work around the road closures. When the light is changing quickly, that 10 minutes feels like a lifetime.

    I didn’t park where I really should have, and was rushing to avoid any problems with the place I did park. It ended up working out because the light I wanted had passed anyways, but below are three shots from this morning.

    Sony A7R IV | Sony 24-70 GMII | 35mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 3.2 sec
    Sony A7R IV | Sony 24-70mm GMII | 70mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 1 sec
    Sony A7R IV | Sony 24-70mm GM II | ISO 100 | f/11 | 15 sec
  • Rainy Houston Morning

    Rainy Houston Morning

    As a weekend warrior, I typically don’t let the weather dissuade me from going out. This cool January morning had scattered showers rolling through all morning. Fortunately, I was prepared, and had a great time shooting. This was my first time at this particular location, and the blue hour light and clouds with the wet streets did make for a cool, moody scene.

    Sony A7R IV | Sony 24-70 GM | 25mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 8.0 sec

    Houston has a beautiful skyline, in my opinion. I really enjoyed this view with the tall skyscrapers surrounding the city hall, which was fortunately lit in blue to match the whole scene. Below is taken from the same perspective but I zoomed in to focus on the town hall with the skyscrapers providing a backdrop.

    Sony A7R IV | Sony 24-70 GM | 43mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 3.2 sec

    The previous photos are a bit more typical view of downtown, but I moved to get a view of the northern skyscrapers. This was not as photogenic with this perspective.

    Sony A7R IV | Sony 24-70 GM | 24mm | ISO 100 | f/11 | 3.2 sec
  • My Cameras

    My Cameras

    I’m now on my fifth body. I started with the modest Olympus E-510. A 10 MP, 4/3rd system (Sensor & Mount). After a few years, I upgraded to the E-620, same 4/3rd system but with a 12 MP sensor and an upgraded AF system. I should have done some more research before that purchase though. I liked the higher resolution, but it was noisier.

    Despite being a DSLR, the Olympus cameras were very small, as were the lenses and they were easy to carry about. I, however, started having issues with the AF system. I also found manual focus without focus assist to be difficult for far away subjects. These struggles and mounting frustrations led to me falling out of photography for a while.

    After a few years, I was dying to get back into things, but I really wanted a new camera to address my frustrations. Pretty quickly, I was looking at mirrorless systems due to their EVF. I know for many photographers, the EVF is a travesty. For me, having focus assist in the EVF and that the image would change to match the set camera settings were very desirable.

    After much research, thank you dpreview.com, I settled on the Sony a6400. It hit the right price, all of the features, and was well reviewed for photo quality. This is an APS-C sensor with the Sony E-mount for lenses. I had purchased this with the 16-55 kit lens, but shortly thereafter I purchased the 70-350 G lens. The kit lens was pretty soft, so I upgraded it to the 16-55 G lens.

    After a few years, I was wanting to upgrade to Full-Frame, and I had a trip to Yosemite coming up, so I opted to pull the trigger. I first opted for the Sony A7 mark 4. This was brilliant, but the location assist annoyed me, and at the same time Sony had a massive discount on the camera I really wanted. The Sony A7R mark 4. I returned the a7 in favor of the a7R, and I was in heaven.

    With the move to full frame, I needed to upgrade my lenses, too. I started with the 24-70 Sigma Art, and the 70-200 G lens. After a bit with them, I did return them and I upgraded to the 24-70 G Master (mark 1), and the 100-400 G Master.

    I have been very happy with the results on these upgrades. I love the 61 MP images.